That’s an interesting problem.
Neither 15% nor 25% can be called as bad returns. After all, risk free rates are at 8% or even less. But ofcourse, we are greedy and we prefer higher returns. Isn’t it?
I recently wrote an article for MoneyControl titled:
‘Which fund should you choose: A 15% annual return for 10 years or 25% annual return for 3 years?’
Here is a short snippet of the article…
To be fair, both 15% and 25% average annual returns are pretty decent.
And let’s accept that the former is more achievable than the latter in the long run. At least for those who know their fund managers aren’t Warren Buffett.
But jokes apart…
You can read the rest of the article by clicking the link below:
[Click to read] – Pick an MF with 15% p.a. in 10 years Vs an MF with 25% p.a in 3 years
Hope you find the article useful.